NO!SPEC Redesign: David Airey and Jeanette Wickham

David Airey Redesigns NO!SPEC

Some of you might know that I also run the NO!SPEC Campaign. For those who aren’t aware, the early campaign days are documented in the categories to the right.

The NO!SPEC Campaign was put together in a mammoth rush. Two overlapping teams were created to come up with design and copy, each team with an aim of working towards the final product. Doing it this way made it sort of a scattered experience at best, but it garnered results.

From the very beginning we knew that the site would eventually need a quieter redesign. That the IN YOUR FACE [insert expletive here] layout wasn’t meant to last forever. Also needed was a logical nav structure, as sometimes finding things was… whoooh…

But for years we were too shagged out busy with the campaign; less concerned with making pretty.

Every so often I’d get emails from designers offering to redo the site design. Jay and I would look at portfolios, check out code, and then get back to the campaign.

Several months back long-time buddy David Airey offered to do the redesign. I knew David’s portfolio and I was also aware of how he worked with clients. So I knew that we’d work well together too.

As Jay is the one responsible for everything under the NO!SPEC hood, I forwarded David’s offer. Jay blessed it with a yes.

David mentioned that the design brief was brief.
And indeed it was.

David: Brief?
Cat: Simple.
David: This?
Cat and Jay: Like.

As expected, the redesign went smoothly. No drama. No snafus. Although – and I just have to confess this part – late in the day (after most everything was done) I did start hankering after a third column to share @nospec twitter tweets. Heh. Don’t you just hate that from clients? But, without making a last minute request, I shelved the idea for afters.

If you read the comments in David’s post about the redesign you’ll see some grumbling (nothing huge, mind you). Also in the comments is an excellent point made by Jeff Fisher (LogoMotives).

I do think that many forget the NO!SPEC site is not just a resource for design students and those in the design profession. I often direct businesses, organizations, “contest” coordinators, educators, publications and others to the website for information about the topic of speculative work. I did so yesterday after receiving an invitation from GermanAviation.com to participate in a ‘competition’ [i.e. "contest"] for a new logo design. Who knows if they even bothered to visit the site for a little NO!SPEC education – but, if they did so, a very professional presence was there to be explored.

Looking at the bigger picture – communication industry + clients – is one of the main reasons I went with a calmer, more professional design this time.

All in all, I expected more of a negative reaction, but in a different direction. No matter. Eventually, everyone will get used to the cleaner design. And hey, I promise that we’ll do our best to muff everyone off with the next revamp… kidding ;-)

I’m all the way down here and there’s thanking yet to do.

The NO!SPEC Campaign started out with 20 tireless designers in the NO!SPEC committee. And they were brilliant. Some even worked through illnesses brought on from the late hours needed to put the project together. But people do have jobs and lives to get to, families to see, and all that.

So the way the NO!SPEC team shakes out today, there is a smaller, looser team comprised of Jay Wickham, David Airey, and Steve Douglas. [edit] I forgot to add myself. Between the four of us, we hold down the fort. You see, when I’m fed up with the spec cacca (it can get pretty depressing), it’s Steve and David who prop me up, giving me the support to continue on. And it’s Jay doing what needs to be done codewise, as well as fixing what I break (which is often).

Jeff Fisher, a member of the original NO!SPEC committee, continues to support the campaign on a regular basis. And btw, the original committee is not permanently out of the picture. They come in ever so often when I yelp for help.

Debbie Millman, who we all know and love, is another designer working on spec issues (I swear that lass never sleeps). And when I’m fussing up a storm, Deb sometimes sends soothing noises my way.

So a HUGE thank you from me goes to everyone involved. Everyone who has worked on the NO!SPEC Campaign in the past, all the way to the present, and even to those coming in later. Everyone who has written a post about spec issues, tweeted and retweeted those posts, whatever. It’s all important. And I thank you.

Enjoy…

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Pixlpusher and more …

Pixlpusher
Pixlpusher

I don’t post many tutorial / designy focused blogs. Neither do I share many web / css focused blogs. It’s because I don’t do tutorials much anymore. And for css, there’s a Jay. It’s selfish. I know. But, in the future I promise to rectify this oversight. Like, starting yesterday, with Concept Design Workshop. [... Continue reading ... Pixlpusher and more …

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Open Letter to CL (Craigslist) Administration

Open Letter to CL
Open Letter to CL

Yesterday, this letter was forwarded to NO!SPEC. Soon after, the letter was replaced by ‘This posting has been flagged for removal’.

After reading, I feel the author has put forward valid points as well as a doable solution to the escalating problem at Craigslist.
[... Continue reading ... Open Letter to CL (Craigslist) Administration

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

NO!SPEC looking for craigslist author

I Wish I Had Written This
I Wish I Had Written This

I should have titled this post “it’s all in a title” or some such, but we’re earnestly looking for the author of this craigslist piece.

I’m not sure for how long, but there’s a wonderfully written article repeatedly being posted on craigslist. At the bottom of the article is “Please copy and repost daily so that our profession may be respected.” So someone posts it, it gets taken off, then reposted again.
[... Continue reading ... NO!SPEC looking for craigslist author

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

VANOC and GDC on NO!SPEC

Society of Graphic Designers of Canada
Society of Graphic Designers of Canada

About:
We’re thrilled to announce that VANOC has adopted virtually all GDC guidelines and suggestions and have created a fair, equitable and professional RFP that meets with GDC’s approval and support. For those opposed to spec design competitions, this is a momentous occasion in Canadian and international design indeed.

Check out:
VANOC’s RFP page and VANOC makes good on mascot RFP

Via: Steven Luscher from The Vancouver Graphic Design Meetup Group

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Technorati Tags: , , , ,

NO!SPEC: Barenaked Ladies with Barenaked Exploitation

Barenaked Ladies
Barenaked Ladies

From Robert Wurth of Freshly Squeezed Design:
So, what do you do when you’re an internationally recognized, successful band with millions of dollars in CD and concert ticket sales? If you’re the Barenaked Ladies, you slap an industry in the face by running an unethical, exploitive contest, that’s what. [... Continue reading ... NO!SPEC: Barenaked Ladies with Barenaked Exploitation

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

NO!SPEC Campaign: Rundown and Roundup

March/April of this year saw the launch of the NO!SPEC campaign. Since then, I’ve come across a number of confusing posts using open source interchangeably with spec. So, to clarify the spirit of the campaign, I’ve put together a short rundown on what working on spec is, and isn’t. What the NO!SPEC Campaign is, and isn’t. [... Continue reading ... NO!SPEC Campaign: Rundown and Roundup

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Matthew Pennell on NO!SPEC and promotion

Matthew Pennell
Matthew Pennell

The Watchmaker Project
The Watchmaker Project

About:
The Watchmaker Project is the weblog and online project playground of internet know-it-all and web designer Matthew Pennell

Check out:
Shitty behaviour from Unmatched Style and Build it and they will come – how to promote your site online.

Related posts:
James Mathias on NO!SPEC NO!SPEC
The growing NO!SPEC Campaign section on Designers who Blog.

Related sites:
Creative Latitude on how the NO!SPEC Campaign began
NO!SPEC at www.no-spec.com

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

James Mathias on NO!SPEC

James Mathias
James Mathias

leihu
leihu

Will The Real Style Shady Please Stand Up? by James Mathias

this entry at The Watchmaker Project details some shady business occurring at one of my fellow 9ruler’s sites Unmatched Style. The shady business appears to be a design contest gone bad.

… this debacle makes a great argument against design contests and spec work, in this case not only did all the entrants lose out, but the so-called winner was also screwed.

Related posts
Designers who Blog on the NO!SPEC Campaign

Related sites
Creative Latitude on how the NO!SPEC Campaign began NO!SPEC at www.no-spec.com

While visiting leihu, be sure to click around as it’s a luscious site, full of surprises.

Check out:
Lt. Thumb and Peter File.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Andy Budd on NO!SPEC

 Andy Budd
Andy Budd

Andy Budd::Blogography
Andy Budd::Blogography

Creative pitches are toxic

In a recent survey of design agencies, the BDI calculated that unpaid creative pitches cost UK agencies an average of 38,000 per year.

As such, the BDI survey found out that over 25% of projects are not awarded after a creative pitch.

I have always believed that creative pitches provide poor value for the client, and makes choosing a design partner harder rather than easier. I also believe unpaid creative pitches are bad for the designers involved and damaging to the industry as a whole. Apart from the large amount of money lost per year, unpaid pitches relegate design to a commodity, and a free commodity at that. People value things they pay for, while they place little stock in things that are free. This is why so many creative pitches go un-awarded.

Brought to you by: NO!SPEC
Check out bloggers contributing to the NO!SPEC Campaign
Read about how the NO!SPEC Campaign began

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Affiliates

My other sites

Friends of DWB

Grab DWB?

Interesting